Re: What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?
Date: 2001-10-02 16:41:23
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0110020938220.46517-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Did we come to any conclusion about whether to accept Gavin Sherry's
> CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION patch?
> http://fts.postgresql.org/db/mw/msg.html?mid=1035792
>
> AFAIR, the score was that I liked it, Bruce didn't, and no one else
> had expressed an opinion.

Since you're asking for opinions,
I think that something of the sort is needed. As for the naming, as long
as we keep things that are similar to this reasonably consistantly named
in the future (like if we decided to do a rule altering one, etc...) it
should be fine. :)

In response to

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2001-10-02 16:51:37 Re: Column lenght
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-10-02 16:27:19 Re: What about CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-10-02 16:42:25 Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2001-10-02 16:36:05 Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes