| From: | Max Khon <fjoe(at)newst(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: 7.2 items |
| Date: | 2001-05-15 05:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0105151250100.8819-100000@lark.nsk.bsgdesign.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
hi, there!
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > I have no objection to the gettext API, but I was and still am concerned
> > > about depending on GNU gettext's code, because of license conflicts.
> > > There is a BSD-license gettext clone project, but it doesn't look to be
> > > very far along.
> >
> > What's missing with it?
>
> * portability
>
> At first glance, uses strlcat and strlcpy. Didn't look further.
you can pull strlcat and strlcpy from *BSD source tree either
they are pretty portable :)
/fjoe
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joe Conway | 2001-05-15 06:19:01 | Re: Re: [HACKERS] contrib |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-05-15 05:31:20 | Re: optimiser problem |