From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | joneil(at)combimatrix(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: SELECT updatability clause defective. |
Date: | 2001-05-09 19:04:01 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0105091154560.87402-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Wed, 9 May 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > Jerome O\'Neil (joneil(at)combimatrix(dot)com) reports a bug with a severity of 2
>
> > SELECT updatability clause defective.
>
> Nope.
>
> > The syntax for select updatability clause is non-standard.
>
> That's not a bug.
>
> > While SQL-92 BNF describes it as
> >
> > SELECT ...
> > [FOR UPDATE [OF <column name list>]]
>
> Chapter and verse?
I see it as part of declare cursor (13.1)
<updatability clause> ::=
FOR { READ ONLY | UPDATE [ OF <column name list> ] }
However, I think the updatability clause means something
different than our for update. If I'm reading it write, I think
it tells you whether or not you may do positioned updates on
the cursor.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Vivek Khera | 2001-05-09 19:32:50 | Re: freebsd sample startup script doesn't work |
Previous Message | Vinicio Llumiquinga | 2001-05-09 19:02:26 | help me, please |