| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gary MacDougall <gary(at)freeportweb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta testing version |
| Date: | 2000-12-04 00:53:08 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0012032051560.468-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> > If you write a program which stands on its own, takes no work from
> > uncompensated parties, then you have the unambiguous right to do what
> > ever you want.
>
> Thats a given.
okay, then now I'm confused ... neither SePICK or erServer are derived
from uncompensated parties ... they work over top of PgSQL, but are not
integrated into them, nor have required any changes to PgSQL in order to
make it work ...
... so, where is this whole outcry coming from?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-12-04 01:03:54 | Re: beta testing version |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-12-04 00:50:24 | Re: beta testing version |