| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: make depend (Re: Coming attractions: VPATH build; make variables issue) |
| Date: | 2000-10-19 16:00:28 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0010191259461.974-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > > dep depend:
> > > $(CC) -MM $(CFLAGS) *.c >depend
> >
> > Why? Shouldn't CFLAGS include CPPFLAGS? These targets seem correct
> > to me as they stand ... other than assuming CC is gcc, but nevermind
> > that...
>
> Just a sanity check: Does anyone use `make depend'? Does everyone know
> about the better way to track dependencies? Does every-/anyone know why
> `make depend' is worse? I just don't want to bother fixing something
> that's dead anyway...
Ummmm ... I don't *hangs head* The only place I've ever really seen it
used extensively is the FreeBSD OS/kernel builds ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-10-19 16:12:21 | Re: Solaris FAQ |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-10-19 15:59:13 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: pgsql/doc (FAQ_MSWIN INSTALL_MSWIN) |