| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA(at)wien(dot)spardat(dot)at>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |
| Date: | 2000-10-16 22:51:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0010161951350.342-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Philip Warner writes:
>
> > >I like the pg_{import,export} names myself ... *nod*
> >
> > Sounds fine also; but we have compatibility issues in that we still need
> > pg_dump. Maybe just a symbolic link to pg_export.
>
> I'm not so fond of changing a long-established program name for the sake
> of ethymological correctness or consistency with other products (yeah,
> right). I got plenty of suggestions if you want to start that. I say
> stick to pg_dump[all], and name the inverse pg_undump, pg_load, or
> pmud_gp.
pmud_gp? *raised eyebrow*
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Per Hedeland | 2000-10-16 23:29:40 | Re: getting local domain to get attached through sendmail ... |
| Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2000-10-16 22:51:11 | Re: AW: Backup, restore & pg_dump |