From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... |
Date: | 2000-09-26 21:07:28 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009261806160.4209-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
@#%(at)#$@#$(at)!$@ and checking /var/log/messages confirms that :(
Sep 26 17:01:04 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 93 d6 9f 0 0 80 0
Sep 26 17:01:04 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): HARDWARE FAILURE info:93d6dd asc:32,0
Sep 26 17:01:04 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): No defect spare location available field replaceable unit: 4
Sep 26 17:01:04 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 93 d6 af 0 0 70 0
Sep 26 17:01:04 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): HARDWARE FAILURE info:93d6f1 asc:32,0
Sep 26 17:01:04 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): No defect spare location available field replaceable unit: 4
Sep 26 17:01:06 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 72 96 2f 0 0 10 0
Sep 26 17:01:06 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): HARDWARE FAILURE info:729637 asc:32,0
Sep 26 17:01:06 pgsql /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): No defect spare location available field replaceable unit: 4
shit shit shit :(
thanks tom ... never even thought to check that :(
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
> It looks like you are suffering from actual hardware failures:
>
> %cd /pgsql/data/base/horde
> %ls -l pg_attribute_relid_attnam_index
> -rw------- 1 pgsql pgsql 65536 Aug 21 12:27 pg_attribute_relid_attnam_index
> %wc pg_attribute_relid_attnam_index
> wc: pg_attribute_relid_attnam_index: read: Input/output error
>
> %wc *
> 1 1 4 PG_VERSION
> wc: active_sessions: read: Input/output error
> 13 50 16384 active_sessions_pkey
> 0 0 0 auth_user
> 0 0 0 auth_user_md5
> 0 3 16384 auth_user_md5_pkey
> 0 3 16384 auth_user_pkey
> 51 806 32768 imp_addr
> 0 5 8192 imp_logs
> 97 468 16384 imp_pref
> 0 3 16384 k_username
> 0 3 16384 k_username_md5
> 1 101 8192 pg_aggregate
> 1 11 16384 pg_aggregate_name_type_index
> 1 12 8192 pg_am
> wc: pg_am_name_index: read: Input/output error
> 3 220 16384 pg_amop
> 3 31 16384 pg_amop_opid_index
> 2 26 16384 pg_amop_strategy_index
> 2 70 8192 pg_amproc
> 0 136 8192 pg_attrdef
> 0 10 16384 pg_attrdef_adrelid_index
> 35 736 57344 pg_attribute
> wc: pg_attribute_relid_attnam_index: read: Input/output error
> 16 664 32768 pg_attribute_relid_attnum_index
> 23 144 16384 pg_class
> 2 112 16384 pg_class_oid_index
> 2 17 16384 pg_class_relname_index
> 58 3096 73728 pg_description
> wc: pg_description_objoid_index: read: Input/output error
> 2 84 8192 pg_index
> 1 47 16384 pg_index_indexrelid_index
> 0 0 0 pg_indexes
> 0 0 0 pg_inheritproc
> 0 0 0 pg_inherits
> 0 3 16384 pg_inherits_relid_seqno_index
> 0 4 1752 pg_internal.init
> 0 0 0 pg_ipl
> 0 10 8192 pg_language
> 0 3 16384 pg_language_name_index
> 0 8 16384 pg_language_oid_index
> 0 0 0 pg_listener
> wc: pg_listener_relname_pid_index: read: Input/output error
> 1 39 8192 pg_opclass
> 1 39 16384 pg_opclass_deftype_index
> 1 9 16384 pg_opclass_name_index
> wc: pg_operator: read: Input/output error
> 11 652 32768 pg_operator_oid_index
> 14 95 65536 pg_operator_oprname_l_r_k_index
> 176 3305 212992 pg_proc
> 71 1520 49152 pg_proc_oid_index
> wc: pg_proc_proname_narg_type_index: read: Input/output error
> 0 0 0 pg_relcheck
> 0 3 16384 pg_relcheck_rcrelid_index
> 28 351 8192 pg_rewrite
> wc: pg_rewrite_oid_index: read: Input/output error
> 0 3 16384 pg_rewrite_rulename_index
> 0 0 0 pg_rules
> 15 327 16384 pg_statistic
> 10 232 16384 pg_statistic_relid_att_index
> 0 0 0 pg_tables
> 0 6 8192 pg_trigger
> 0 4 16384 pg_trigger_tgconstrname_index
> 0 5 16384 pg_trigger_tgconstrrelid_index
> 0 5 16384 pg_trigger_tgrelid_index
> 8 170 16384 pg_type
> 3 150 16384 pg_type_oid_index
> 2 20 16384 pg_type_typname_index
> 0 0 0 pg_user
> 0 0 0 pg_views
> 655 13822 1132252 total
>
>
> Do you know if there's a way to determine where these files are
> physically stored? I'm wondering if all the damaged indexes live
> on the same disk track/cylinder/whatever ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2000-09-26 21:52:24 | Re: SV: Case sensitive field names |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-26 20:53:17 | Re: Damn, pg_proc index corrupted, can't find anythign on REINDEX ... |