From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: FreeBSD Softupdates?? |
Date: | 2000-09-26 15:30:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0009261228490.4209-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
I've been runing since softupdates became mainstream, on a relatively
heavily used production server ... I can't answer about performance
gains/loss, but from what I know of softupdates, it should be neglible for
a database system ... but, I haven't been 'shot in the foot' yet for any
of our database ...
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Neil Conway wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2000 at 03:20:31AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > It can cause problems because softupdates makes meta data changes
> > (in this case file creation/removal) asyncronously, the same actually
> > happens with most other logging filesystems that don't support
> > transactions.
>
> I've been running FreeBSD 4.1 with soft updates on my development box
> for a while now without any problems at all. Although it's not
> production so there's not a lot of load on PgSQL.
>
> I don't know if it hurts or hampers performance.
>
> HTH,
>
> Neil
>
> --
> Neil Conway <neilconway(at)home(dot)com>
> Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc
> Encrypted mail welcomed
>
> I am not interested in the past. I am interested in the future for
> that is where I intend to spend the rest of my life.
> -- Charles F. Ketterring
>
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alfred Perlstein | 2000-09-26 15:38:08 | Re: FreeBSD Softupdates?? |
Previous Message | Michelle Murrain | 2000-09-26 15:11:52 | Re: web programming |