Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
Date: 2000-09-08 00:17:05
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0009072116070.527-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > I have a database where, periodically, I get a query that is producing
> > pg_noname files that are >1gig in size ... according to syslog, for that
> > process:
>
> > Sep 7 18:36:39 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG: ExecRestrPos: node type 17 not supported
> > Sep 7 18:36:39 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG: ExecRestrPos: node type 17 not supported
> > Sep 7 18:36:40 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG: ExecRestrPos: node type 17 not supported
> > Sep 7 18:36:56 pgsql postgres[47078]: DEBUG: ExecMarkPos: node type 17 not supported
> > %
>
> This is the planner bug that I was just alluding to in other email ---
> the planner is trying to use a nestloop as the inner input to a
> mergejoin, and that doesn't work :-(. But you only see the problem if
> the outer side contains multiple matches to a single inside tuple.
>
> I have a fix for current sources; let me see if I can retrofit it for
> 7.0.*.

that would be perfect ... if we can get that retrofit'd, I'd be quite
tempted to put out a 7.0.3 for this, considering that its obviously not an
isolated incident ;(

Thanks ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-09-08 02:18:01 Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-09-08 00:13:18 Re: [7.0.2] node type 17 not supported ...