| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Some gripes about BugTool |
| Date: | 2000-08-24 12:26:24 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0008240925500.801-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Aug 2000, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > I take it the "PostgreSQL BugTool Submission" posts that've been
> > appearing on pgsql-bugs for the last day or so are output from our
> > much-discussed new bug tracking system. I have a couple of major
> > problems with these reports:
> > 1. Utterly useless Subject: line. Why does the form ask
> > for a "short description" if not to use as a subject?
>
> easily changed.
>
> > 2. From: line is pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, ie, the mail
> > list address, not the address of the bug submitter.
> > This makes it hard to reply to the submitter.
>
> You have to be on the list to send mail to it. Since every user isn't
> on the list they can't be in the From line. Complain to Marc.
hrmm, how about setting a Reply-To: address that contains both the
submitter email and the list?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-08-24 12:29:06 | Re: AW: How Do You Pronounce "PostgreSQL"? |
| Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2000-08-24 11:03:14 | Re: Some gripes about BugTool |