From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Adam Haberlach <adam(at)newsnipple(dot)com> |
Cc: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, Ned Lilly <ned(at)greatbridge(dot)com>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Ben Adida <ben(at)openforce(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |
Date: | 2000-08-22 00:40:38 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0008212139370.801-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 21 Aug 2000, Adam Haberlach wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 11:34:45AM -0700, Don Baccus wrote:
>
> > Strange, OpenACS folk use it regularly and all we've done is put a "report
> > a bug" link on the home page.
>
> ...I'm not sure you noticed, but this project isn't OpenACS. It is
> an established project with decent management that only needs a few features.
> Switching everything over to a canned solution, no matter how good of a
> toolbox you feel it is, is not necessarily going to solve the few problems
> we have without causing a whole host of new ones...
Ummmm, who was talking about switching anything over to a canned
solution? *raised eyebrow* we are talking about allowing the OpenACS
folks setup a bug tracking system for us and seeing if it servces us
better then other attempts have in the past ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Don Baccus | 2000-08-22 00:50:05 | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |
Previous Message | Adam Haberlach | 2000-08-22 00:35:22 | Re: Bug tracking (was Re: +/- Inf for float8's) |