| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's |
| Date: | 2000-08-20 03:07:21 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0008200005320.3758-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 19 Aug 2000, Don Baccus wrote:
> >o how to filter or qualify bug reports so that developers don't spend
> >time having to do that.
>
> Developers don't have to filter or qualify bug reports e-mailed to the
> bugs list today? Who's doing it, then, and why can't they continue
> doing so if another tool is used to manage bug reports?
the problem as I see it with any bug tracking tool is someone has to close
off those bugs when fixed ... right now, someone commits a bug fix, and
then fires off an email to the list stating its fixed ... with a bug
tracking system, then they have to go one more step, open up a web
browser, login to the system, find the bug report and close it ...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2000-08-20 03:20:08 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2000-08-20 03:02:35 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] +/- Inf for float8's |