Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tim Perdue <tperdue(at)valinux(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres
Date: 2000-07-05 17:01:38
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0007051401060.33627-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


I've taken this offlist with Tim/Ben to see what we can come up with
... the thread is/has become too "heated" to get anything productive done
...

On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Tim Perdue wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > Will you accept modifications to this if submit'd, to make better use of
> > features that PostgreSQL has to improve performance? Just downloaded it
> > and am going to look her through, just wondering if it would be a waste of
> > time for me to suggest changes though :)
>
> If you can figure out an algorithm that shows these nested messages more
> efficiently on postgres, then that would be a pretty compelling reason
> to move SourceForge to Postgres instead of MySQL, which is totally
> reaching its limits on our site. Right now, neither database appears
> like it will work, so Oracle is starting to loom on the horizon.
>
> Tim
>
> --
> Founder - PHPBuilder.com / Geocrawler.com
> Lead Developer - SourceForge
> VA Linux Systems
> 408-542-5723
>
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-07-05 17:06:33 Re: Re: pg_dump and LOs (another proposal)
Previous Message Tim Perdue 2000-07-05 17:00:39 Re: Article on MySQL vs. Postgres