Re: responses to licensing discussion

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gilles DAROLD <gilles(at)darold(dot)net>, PostgreSQL GENERAL <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: responses to licensing discussion
Date: 2000-07-05 16:52:48
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0007051343210.33627-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Gilles DAROLD wrote:
> >> Is PostgreSQL Inc. have the same need than Landmark/Great Bridge
> >> concerning this licence migration ?
>
> > Nope ... this is purely a perceived problem by the Landmark/Great Bridge
> > folk ... one that I can't count how many OSS projects out there
> > don't/haven't felt a need for *shrug*
>
> Au contraire --- we have had repeated discussions in the past about the
> license, and quite a few folks have expressed concern that we need to
> alter the pure Berkeley language we inherited. This particular proposal
> is from Great Bridge and has some stuff in it that was never proposed
> before, but please don't claim that there's not been any perceived
> problem. There has been.

Oops, sorry ... I *do* like the extra BOLD stuff, as I like the fact that
it extends the license to cover non-UNIVERSITY developers ... hadn't meant
to make it such an 'all-encompassing' statement ... as you state, there
are bits of it that I do like ...

But, I am also firmly of the opinion that if the BSD license "as is" was
such a big problem legal, projects like the *BSDs would have long changed
theirs ... the FreeBSD folks have their own 'retained legal counsel' that
they've been workign with through the whole cryptography debate, so I
don't think that they would have overlooked this if it was a problem ...

Personally, I'd like the whole thing weeded down to ... get rid of the
'juristiction of ...' (which nobody outside of the US will agree to, from
what I've been seeing on the list) ... and get rid of "Any person who
contributes ..." paragraph, which several ppl have voiced a concern about,
and we might have something that non-US developers can agree to ...

can someone also explain to me what ", NEED, OR QUALITY, AND ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTY FROM COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. IN ADDITION, THERE IS
NO IMPLIED WARRANTY AGAINST INTERFERENCE WITH ENJOYMENT OR AGAINST
INFRINGEMENT." is supposed to mean? what the hell is "INTERFERENCE WITH
ENJOYMENT OR AGAINST INFRINGEMENT"?

===============
PostgreSQL Data Base Management System (formerly known as Postgres95)

This directory contains the _______ release of PostgreSQL, as well as
various post-release patches in the patches directory. See INSTALL for
the installation notes and HISTORY for the changes.

We also have a WWW home page located at: http://www.postgreSQL.org

-------------------------

PostgreSQL is not public domain software. It is copyrighted by the
University of California but may be used according to the following
licensing terms:

POSTGRES95 Data Base Management System (formerly known as Postgres, then
as Postgres95).

Copyright (c) 1994-8 Regents of the University of California

Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its
documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written
agreement is hereby granted, provided that the above copyright notice and
this paragraph and the following two paragraphs appear in all copies.

IN NO EVENT SHALL THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR
DIRECT, INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING
LOST PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE AND ITS
DOCUMENTATION, EVEN IF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HAS BEEN ADVISED OF
THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS ANY WARRANTIES,
INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED HEREUNDER IS
ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, AND THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA HAS NO OBLIGATIONS
TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS, OR MODIFICATIONS.

-------------------------

Copyright ( 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000 by various contributors (as
identified in HISTORY) (collectively "Developers") which may be used
according to the following licensing terms:

Worldwide permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software
and its documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without a written
agreement is hereby granted, on a non-exclusive basis, provided that the
above copyright notice, this paragraph and the following paragraphs appear
in all copies:

IN NO EVENT SHALL ANY DEVELOPER BE LIABLE TO ANY PARTY FOR DIRECT,
INDIRECT, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, INCLUDING,
WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE
AND ITS DOCUMENTATION, EVEN IF THE DEVELOPER HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE
POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.

THE DEVELOPERS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, NEED, OR QUALITY, AND ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTY FROM COURSE OF DEALING OR USAGE OF TRADE. IN ADDITION, THERE IS
NO IMPLIED WARRANTY AGAINST INTERFERENCE WITH ENJOYMENT OR AGAINST
INFRINGEMENT. THE SOFTWARE AND DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED HEREUNDER IS ON AN
"AS IS" BASIS. NO DEVELOPER HAS ANY OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE MAINTENANCE,
SUPPORT, UPDATES, ENHANCEMENTS OR MODIFICATIONS TO OR FOR THE SOFTWARE OR
DOCUMENTATION.

BY USING THIS SOFTWARE YOU AGREE TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS. IF YOU DO
NOT AGREE TO THESE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, YOU SHOULD NOT USE THIS SOFTWARE.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2000-07-05 16:58:10 Re: help -- cursor inside a function
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-07-05 16:36:55 Re: responses to licensing discussion