Re: Postgres Instability

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: karl(at)debisschop(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres Instability
Date: 2000-05-25 00:28:07
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0005242127080.243-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, 24 May 2000, Karl DeBisschop wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 May 2000, Karl DeBisschop wrote:
> >
> > > The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 24 May 2000, planx plnetx wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I've remarked that postgresql-7.0 have two important bugs no, no...
> > > > > I'll define its Problems.
> > > > >
> > > > > The first is that it is very subsceptible to ipc: it's true that sometimes
> > > > > U need to do an ipcclean to remake it start
> > > >
> > > > This sounds like a Linux problem to me ... I've got v7.0 running on a
> > > > server over here that is dealign with the Search engine for the PostgreSQL
> > > > site (over 10million tuples in one table, indexing over 90k URLs) and the
> > > > server has been running flawlessly for the past ~14days now, and what is
> > > > only because that was the last time we rebooted it ...
> > >
> > > We've been running 7.0 on a linux server since RC3 on a database with
> > > over 40 million tuples without this problem (all 40 million tuples are
> > > indexed on 3 fields). So I'm not sure I see how it can be concluded
> > > that this is a linux problem.
> >
> > Could his Linux server be mis-configured?
>
> Could be. But he said he installed separately on several installs -
> redhat 6.1, 6.2, and mandrake I believe.
>
> I don't think he indicated whether he used the RPMS or compiled himself.
> Assuming this is some sort of configuration issue, which seems sort of
> likely, it's at least as likely that it's related to a misunderstanding
> about how to cofigure postgreSQL.
>
> Since I can't reproduce the error, and since I'm only beginning to get
> familiar with little bits of the DBMS internals, I can't really help.
> But I did want to put my counter-example out there so that Linux users
> wouldn't get the sense that your fine product is somehow unreliable on
> Linux. IIRC, Linux is a large part of your installed base - no real
> point in scaring them off. Even if there are other legitimate arguments
> for other OS's.

no probs, I just wanted to point out the possibility that it was a server
config issue, and not a postgresql one ... as I mentioned in another part
of this thread, FreeBSD doesn't enable SharedMemory by default, so without
a kernel build, you can't use PostgreSQL :(

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Charles Tassell 2000-05-25 00:32:03 Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 7.0 a success
Previous Message Alex Pilosov 2000-05-25 00:08:11 Re: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 7.0 a success