| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Michael A(dot) Olson" <mao(at)sleepycat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Berkeley DB license |
| Date: | 2000-05-16 17:48:50 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0005161447520.208-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 May 2000, Michael A. Olson wrote:
> >
> > > Rather than replacing just the storage manager, you'd be replacing
> > > the access methods, buffer manager, transaction manager, and some
> > > of the shared memory plumbing with our stuff.
> >
> > So, basically, we rip out 3+ years or work on our backend and put an SQL
> > front-end over top of BerkleyDB?
>
> Now, no one is suggesting we do this. The issue is exploring what gains
> we could make in doing this.
Definitely ... I'm just reducing it down to simpler terms, that's all :)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-16 17:52:03 | Re: Berkeley DB license |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-05-16 16:57:16 | Re: Actually it's a bufmgr issue (was Re: Another pg_listener issue) |