Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Mitch Vincent <mitch(at)huntsvilleal(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
Date: 2000-05-04 13:33:44
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0005041030090.92638-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 4 May 2000, Mitch Vincent wrote:

> Ok, the production server is a Celeron 433, 512 MEgs of PC100 ECC RAM, 2 18
> Gig Ultra 160 SCSI drives (only running at 80 megs since we dono't have a
> 64-bit PCI slot).
>
> There is a big upgrade planned for this box when the motherboard we're
> waiting for comes out..
>
> The development server is a PII450, 128 Megs of RAM and Ultra 2 SCSI
> drives.. However it's running several other things other than the database
> and webserver so it has a small load.

Wait, correct me if I'm wrong, but the more powerful CPU is in your
development server?

My understanding is that a Celeron is a chop'd up PII ... my first
recommendation here is that if you are running a *server*, get rid of that
Celeron ... from what I've been told about the difference, Celeron is a
great, cheap chip for using in a desktop environment (its what I use at
home), but shy away from it in a server environment, as the speed
reduction of the reduced cache alone will hurt things ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mitch Vincent 2000-05-04 13:44:25 Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )
Previous Message Mitch Vincent 2000-05-04 13:18:40 Re: system usage stats (Was: Re: Why Not MySQL? )