Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release)
Date: 2000-02-22 23:43:28
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0002221942180.86931-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > > I'm going to do this tonight, put it up and see what ppl thing ... if
> > > > nothing else, it makes it easier for ppl to download smaller chunks ...
> > >
> > > Seems like a good idea. Only RPM packages would have to know of the
> > > split.
> >
> > Huh? *raised eyebrow*
>
> Don't RPM's have to know to download two tarballs?

the RPMs are totally seperate tarballs ... unrelated to this ... about the
only thing that would/could be affected is the FreeBSD ports collection,
but I'm still making the 'all-inclusive tar ball', so if ppl have a high
speed connection and want to download it all at once, they can ... just
increasing the options

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-22 23:45:05 Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-02-22 23:42:06 Re: Splitting distributions (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG / Release)