Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>, "Ansley, Michael" <Michael(dot)Ansley(at)intec(dot)co(dot)za>, "'Rod Chamberlin '" <rod(at)querix(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org '" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL
Date: 2000-01-07 04:00:41
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0001070000100.18498-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > select ...
> > from t1 inner join t4 on t1.x=t4.x,
> > t2 left outer join t1
> > on t2.y=t1.y and
> > (t1.start_date between t2.start_date and t1.start_date),
> > t3 left outer join t1 on t3.x=t1.x and t3.y = t1.y;
>
> Let's be honest, folks. This is almost unreadable. I think we will
> need some simpler way to access _outer_ in addition to the ANSI way.
>
> I can't imagine how I would answer a question: "How do I do an ANSI
> outer join". It would need its own FAQ page.

How do the "books" talk about JOINs? What is the semi-standard syntax
that is generally used in samples?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Lockhart 2000-01-07 06:47:46 Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL
Previous Message Don Baccus 2000-01-07 03:32:32 Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL