Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Rod Chamberlin <rod(at)querix(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL
Date: 2000-01-06 16:36:10
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.21.0001061235450.18498-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> > 1/ Datetime type specifiers (should have no impact)
> > 2/ Interval type specifiers (ditto)
>
> We support enough datestyle variants already that it's hard to believe
> there isn't one that will meet your needs. But if not, I think adding
> an "Informix" datestyle option might be considered reasonable.

Isn't Thomas trying to reduce the number of variants?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2000-01-06 16:40:03 Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL
Previous Message Oleg Broytmann 2000-01-06 16:20:35 Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch