| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal |
| Date: | 2000-01-05 18:21:55 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.21.0001051420420.18498-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > They need to be educated about us.....
> > http://www2.linuxjournal.com/articles/conversations/010.html
>
> Yeah. I just sent a comment to them on this. I had talked to Marjorie
> Richards (from memory; I think that is the name) at LinuxWorld in
> August regarding Postgres articles, and she indicated that they might
> be interested in principle but that that they had recently done an
> introductory review article (nice and complimentary btw) and didn't
> have a specific need for more intro material. We have had mention in
> other articles since then, as the tool used to implement other apps.
> But it seems that Doc Searls doesn't read them very carefully ;)
Personally, I think that everyone should go to that article and put in a
comment to the effect that the Title of the article is inaccurate, and
insults the whole Open Source movement by claiming that a commercial
product, going open source, gets labelled as "The first major..."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Meskes | 2000-01-05 18:30:59 | Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG and FETCH |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 2000-01-05 18:10:14 | Re: ECPG documentation |