From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de |
Cc: | Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications? |
Date: | 1999-11-24 05:25:00 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.9911240123270.63896-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de wrote:
> a) Due to the database layouts we are in need of doing all these nice
> sql-statements like "group by" and "having" ... and as posted earlier
> in this group: they're limited in PostgreSQL.
Since I use 'Group By' quite a bit...Having not so much...can you be more
specific on the problems?
> b) We had problems with vacuumdb here and there. Some times it cored.
> We've deleted a 300 MB database under psql and the backend cored ...
What version of PostgreSQL?
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adriaan Joubert | 1999-11-24 06:47:06 | Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions |
Previous Message | Lincoln Yeoh | 1999-11-24 03:44:37 | Re: [GENERAL] logging stuff in the right sequence. |