Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de
Cc: Stephen Birch <sbirch(at)ironmountainsystems(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-novice(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Is PostgreSQL ready for mission criticalapplications?
Date: 1999-11-24 05:25:00
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.10.9911240123270.63896-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, 23 Nov 1999 marten(at)feki(dot)toppoint(dot)de wrote:

> a) Due to the database layouts we are in need of doing all these nice
> sql-statements like "group by" and "having" ... and as posted earlier
> in this group: they're limited in PostgreSQL.

Since I use 'Group By' quite a bit...Having not so much...can you be more
specific on the problems?

> b) We had problems with vacuumdb here and there. Some times it cored.
> We've deleted a 300 MB database under psql and the backend cored ...

What version of PostgreSQL?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Adriaan Joubert 1999-11-24 06:47:06 Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 1999-11-24 03:44:37 Re: [GENERAL] logging stuff in the right sequence.