From: | Jie Liang <jliang(at)ipinc(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pl/Perl |
Date: | 2001-03-14 17:04:49 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.10103140856100.62546-100000@tidal.ipinc.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Tom,
1.Where or how I can get pltcl.so? I have not find this file anywhere in
my
source except a pltcl.c.
2.Dose installation same as plpgsql?
i.e.
CREATE FUNCTION pltcl_call_handler () RETURNS OPAQUE AS
'/usr/local/pgsql/lib/pltcl.so' LANGUAGE 'C';
CREATE TRUSTED PROCEDURAL LANGUAGE 'pltcl'
HANDLER pltcl_call_handler
LANCOMPILER 'PL/pgtcl';
3.Where I can find more doc about pltcl?
Thanks for your time.
Jie LIANG
St. Bernard Software
10350 Science Center Drive
Suite 100, San Diego, CA 92121
Office:(858)320-4873
jliang(at)ipinc(dot)com
www.stbernard.com
www.ipinc.com
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jie Liang <jliang(at)ipinc(dot)com> writes:
> > My choice:
> > if involving a lot of regular expressions, pl/Perl is better;
> > if involving a lot of SQLs or other functions(or store procedures),
> > then pl/pgsql is better.
>
> Also consider pltcl, which has pretty nearly perl-equivalent regexp
> support, and can do queries too. Besides which it's easier to build/
> install than plperl.
>
> It's a shame that plperl doesn't yet have support for making queries.
> It hasn't really progressed much past the proof-of-concept stage IMHO,
> but no one is working on it :-(
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | George Young | 2001-03-14 17:24:12 | need to join successive log entries into one |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2001-03-14 16:56:10 | Re: [SQL] PL/pgSQL "compilation error" |