Re: PErformance in tables to large

From: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
To: vlal(at)ideay(dot)net(dot)ni
Cc: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PErformance in tables to large
Date: 2000-09-27 02:15:28
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.10.10009261914561.86455-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin


Have you done a vacuum analyze on the tables, what are the
queries you're running and what does the explain output
from them look like?

Stephan Szabo
sszabo(at)bigpanda(dot)com

On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 vlal(at)ideay(dot)net(dot)ni wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a table with 3,000,000 of rows, I have two index:
> idx1 on --> (f_name,s_name,f_lastname,s_lastname)
> idx1 on --> (f_name,f_lastname)
>
> if the query is on 4 columns of the idx1, the result is speed, but if teh
> query is on two columns of the idx2 the rsult take 10 minutes.
>
> My postmaster run with option -S -o -F for best performance, but the
> results is very slow.
>
> I need suggestions, Thanks in advance,
>
> Regards,
> "La Vida"
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vlal 2000-09-27 02:31:35 PErformance in tables to large
Previous Message Stephan Szabo 2000-09-26 17:00:55 Re: Fail initdb en PostgreSQL V 7.02