From: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone23(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net> |
Cc: | Hackers List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Really bad/weird stuff with views over tables in 7.0.2 |
Date: | 2000-09-02 17:51:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.10.10009021044100.77525-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> If you define a table and then create a select query rule over it
> then drop the rule the table will be gone.
What were you doing precisely? When I made a simple table and
then turned it into a view with a rule, dropping the rule
didn't seem to drop the table for me, I could still select
from it, etc after the rule dropped. [I think I probably
misunderstood what you were doing, but...]
create table aa1 (a int);
create rule "_RETaa1" as on select to aa1 do instead
select anum as a from a;
select * from aa1;
drop rule "_RETaa1";
select * from aa1;
seems to work. The first select gives me whatever was in a
and the second gives me anything i inserted into aa1 before
making the rule.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-02 18:06:38 | Re: Really bad/weird stuff with views over tables in 7.0.2 |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-09-02 17:39:47 | Yet another LIKE-indexing scheme |