Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison
Date: 1999-10-06 14:15:12
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9910061013360.11236-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:

> > Maybe we should support the HAVING without aggregates. What do others
> > think?
>
> If we are the only one that doesn't, it just makes it harder for those
> moving from Oracle/Informix/etc if they happen to be using such queries...

I just tried it on a very old Sybase (ver 4 something, before ODBC was
available for it) and it works on that.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> Have you seen http://www.pop4.net?
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ansley, Michael 1999-10-06 14:16:21 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql c omparison
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-10-06 14:10:17 Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error?