From: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison |
Date: | 1999-10-06 14:15:12 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9910061013360.11236-100000@paprika.michvhf.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> > Maybe we should support the HAVING without aggregates. What do others
> > think?
>
> If we are the only one that doesn't, it just makes it harder for those
> moving from Oracle/Informix/etc if they happen to be using such queries...
I just tried it on a very old Sybase (ver 4 something, before ODBC was
available for it) and it works on that.
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> Have you seen http://www.pop4.net?
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ansley, Michael | 1999-10-06 14:16:21 | RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql c omparison |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1999-10-06 14:10:17 | Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error? |