Re: [HACKERS] 'idle' processes in v6.5?

On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:

> > ... under a Linux system ...
> ^^^^^
>
> Ah, finally seen the light...
> You didn't expect _that_ to go unnoticed, did you?

I'm getting paid *well* to put up with it :)

> > 19130 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postmaster -o -F -o /usr/local/pgsql/er
> > 19416 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 19418 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 19425 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21163 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21288 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21290 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21303 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > 21445 p2 S 0:00 /usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres 127.0.0.1 nobody imp idle
> > yet nobody is using that system yet except me testing a couple of times...
>
> Yes, "nobody" *is* using the system. You sure you don't have a web
> server or something? Anything else running as "nobody"?

Ya, but no connections through it yet...does PHP auto-open connections to
the backend as a sort of cache/pool?

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org