| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) |
| Date: | 1999-06-17 16:47:19 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9906171346340.49155-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jun 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > There is nothing configured on hub.org to exclude the
> > > images directory...
> >
> > Sorry in advance for the re/misdirection, but would CVSup be a
> > suitable alternative for this task? It is working *great* for me to
> > replicate the CVS tree, but it also handles normal directory trees. It
> > includes lots of compression optimizations and so is very fast...
>
> What was used before rsync that was the bandwidth hog? Wasn't cvs, was
> it?
Nope, ftp/mirror, except that ftp/mirror requires the client to do their
configuration cleanly, whereas with rsync I can setup our end to exclude
stuff (ie. ht/Dig databases)
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-17 16:59:30 | Re: [HACKERS] tables > 1 gig |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-06-17 16:46:28 | Re: [HACKERS] mirroring problem (www.postgresql.org) |