Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release schedule

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release schedule
Date: 1999-06-09 01:30:23
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9906082229590.49155-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


If everyone is in agreement, then I can't dispute it :)

On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > All I am asking is that we wait until things get quiet with 6.5 before
> > splitting. Those first weeks are all double-patching.
>
> I agree with Bruce on this --- double-patching is a pain, and we could
> probably save ourselves some work if we waited a couple weeks before
> splitting the tree. I know I'm not planning on doing anything but
> bug-fixes for a while...
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Alan Dorman 1999-06-09 01:33:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Release schedule
Previous Message Philip Warner 1999-06-09 01:05:57 Re: [HACKERS] PL/Lang (was: Priorities for 6.6)