Re: [HACKERS] Bug in LIKE ?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Daniele Orlandi <daniele(at)orlandi(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Bug in LIKE ?
Date: 1999-06-07 13:50:47
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9906071050140.413-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 7 Jun 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Daniele Orlandi <daniele(at)orlandi(dot)com> writes:
> > Uhm.... I think the problem is a little worse:
>
> It's a real bug, and I see the problem: someone changed the handling of
> LIKE prefixes in gram.y, without understanding quite what they were
> doing. 6.4.2 has:
>
> if (n->val.val.str[pos] == '\\' ||
> n->val.val.str[pos] == '%')
> pos++;
>
> where 6.5 has:
>
> if (n->val.val.str[pos] == '\\' ||
> n->val.val.str[pos+1] == '%')
> pos++;
>
> The first one is right and the second is not.
>
> Unless we fix this, LIKE will be completely busted for any string
> containing non-leading %. Shall I ... ?

Please do...looking through the logs, any idea who changed this one? *gets
out billy club* *grin*

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Thompson 1999-06-07 13:54:26 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL History(Parody)
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-06-07 13:44:07 Re: [HACKERS] Bug in LIKE ?