Re: [HACKERS] Re: Freezing docs for v6.5

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Freezing docs for v6.5
Date: 1999-06-03 19:01:10
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9906031559560.413-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > > > If the 'bugs' aren't something new we created since v6.4.2, leave them
> > > > alone...would be nice to fix them, but nobody expected them to work to
> > > > date, so leavign it for v6.6 (or even a v6.5.1) is acceptable...
> > > >
> > >
> > > Isn't minor bugfixing in 6.5.1 a no-no. We only do major fixes in those
> > > minor releases, right?
> >
> > *raised eyebrow* Wouldn't minor-bugfixing be "safer" then major ones?
> >
>
> I thought we only fixed must-fix bugs in minor releases because there
> was too much of a risk that any fix will break too many things, and
> there is little testing of minor releases, so we fix as few things as
> possible.

sorry, heat was hitting me over here :) minor releases are meant to fix
things like 'it doesn't quite install cleaning on X platform', where the
fix is harmless...

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-06-03 19:10:09 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-03 18:59:28 Re: [HACKERS] Priorities for 6.6