From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mark Volpe <mvolpe(at)eos(dot)ncsu(dot)edu> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype |
Date: | 1999-06-01 02:24:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9905312324180.413-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 31 May 1999, Tom Lane wrote:
> BTW, if we did want to make INET and CIDR have different behavior in
> comparisons and indexes, that would mean having two sets of operators
> listed in the system catalogs. We cannot add that as a post-6.5 patch
> because it would require an initdb, which is one of the things we don't
> do between major releases. If it's wrong (I'm not convinced) we must
> either fix it this week or live with it till 6.6 ...
Live with it until 6.6...
Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1999-06-01 02:25:59 | Re: [HACKERS] which list? |
Previous Message | Vadim Mikheev | 1999-06-01 02:12:41 | Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items |