Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Mark Volpe <mvolpe(at)eos(dot)ncsu(dot)edu>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] New IP address datatype
Date: 1999-06-01 02:24:29
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9905312324180.413-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 31 May 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> BTW, if we did want to make INET and CIDR have different behavior in
> comparisons and indexes, that would mean having two sets of operators
> listed in the system catalogs. We cannot add that as a post-6.5 patch
> because it would require an initdb, which is one of the things we don't
> do between major releases. If it's wrong (I'm not convinced) we must
> either fix it this week or live with it till 6.6 ...

Live with it until 6.6...

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-01 02:25:59 Re: [HACKERS] which list?
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-06-01 02:12:41 Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.5 items