Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 TODO list
Date: 1999-05-11 17:28:44
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9905111425360.47191-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 10 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > > Vacuum of tables >2 gigs - NOTICE: Can't truncate multi-segments relation
> >
> > This is definitely a "must fix" item for 6.5, IMHO...
>
> Yes. It shows we are getting bigger. Most/all? of my commerical
> database clients don't have 2-gig tables.

I'm not sure what is involved in fixing this, but...>2gig tables, in the
past, were iffy to start with. if we can fix before v6.5, fine...if not,
my opinion is that isn't a release stopper. Or, rather...is it something
that, other then in testing, has affected anyone?

> > > GROUP BY can reference columns not in target list
> >
> > What's wrong with that?
>
> Is that not a problem. What possible use would GROUP BY on columns not
> in target list be of use. Maybe it is. I remember someone asking for
> something like this. I will remove the item unless someone complains.
> I thought you were the one complaining about it.

Even if we don't remove it, sounds like a feature vs bug fix...

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-05-11 17:53:34 Re: [HACKERS] problem compiling 6.5 cvs (Linux, gcc 2.7.2, egcs 1.12)
Previous Message Andrew Merrill 1999-05-11 17:19:03 new SCO installation FAQ