Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report
Date: 1999-05-07 01:33:38
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9905062230280.47191-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 6 May 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> >> Opinions? Should I plow ahead, or leave this to fix after 6.5 release?
>
> > Estimate of time involved to fix this? vs likelihood of someone
> > triggering the bug in production?
>
> I could probably get the coding done this weekend, unless something else
> comes up to distract me. It's the question of how much testing it'd
> receive before release that worries me...

We're looking at 3 weeks till release...I'll let you call it on this one.
If you feel confident about getting the bug fixed before release, with
enough time for testing, go for it. If it makes more sense to make it an
'untested patch', go for that one.

I believe you can fix this bug, I'm just kinda nervous about adding a
different one, which I believe is your worry also, with the limited amount
of testing possible :(

My preference would be a "use at own risk" patch...

Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-05-07 01:51:58 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-05-06 21:33:04 Re: [HACKERS] Hashjoin status report