Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] int 8 on FreeBSD
Date: 1999-03-08 12:50:19
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9903080849130.7045-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> > Try what I just commited now...its only in v6.5 sources though...
> > I've modified it so that it checks for use of %lld, and if that fails,
> > check for use of %qd, before it falls back to our homebrew snprintf...
>
> What I committed this afternoon will work on a %qd box, it'll just
> choose to insert our homebrew snprintf instead of using the local
> version.
>
> Is it worth adding another test cycle to configure in order to use the
> native snprintf on these boxes? There are not that many boxes that
> use %qd; and it's not real clear that using our own snprintf is a loss
> anyway.

In all cases, using a system function is preferable to a "home brew
solution"...as its then guaranteed to work, and work optimally, for that
system...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-03-08 12:51:07 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4.3 release
Previous Message Kaare Rasmussen 1999-03-08 09:29:24 Re: [HACKERS] Updatable views?