Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken?

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken?
Date: 1999-02-20 05:02:08
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9902200000340.18893-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 19 Feb 1999, Roland Roberts wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> >>>>> "Vince" == Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com> writes:
>
> Vince> Oops! Yeah, I guess lower wouldn't work so well if it was
> Vince> a numeric field. Anyway, username is a char(8).
>
> It won't be equal to 'joblo', it will be equal to 'joblo '. You may
> want to consider using varchar(8).

Damn. That's the one thing that never even occurred to me!

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com flame-mail: /dev/null
# include <std/disclaimers.h> TEAM-OS2
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-02-20 06:17:05 Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken?
Previous Message Roland Roberts 1999-02-20 04:50:07 Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken?