Re: [HACKERS] template/alpha_cc

On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> > src/template/alpha_cc seems missing in 6.4.2 but does exist in current.
> > What about 6.4_REL? I belive that file should exist in any version of
> > source tree.
>
> $ cvs log alpha_cc
>
> RCS file: /usr/local/cvsroot/pgsql/src/template/alpha_cc,v
> Working file: alpha_cc
> head: 1.1
> branch:
> locks: strict
> access list:
> symbolic names:
> keyword substitution: kv
> total revisions: 1; selected revisions: 1
> description:
> ----------------------------
> revision 1.1
> date: 1998/12/18 07:08:02; author: momjian; state: Exp;
> etc etc...
>
> There's no REL6_4 tag, therefore this file does not exist as far as
> the 6.4.* branch is concerned. (Same deal as with discussion of
> vacuumdb a day or two ago.) Bruce could've applied a REL6_4 tag to
> the file when he created it, but did not.
>
> Do we want to continue updating the REL6_4 branch for stuff like this?
> Or is it time to declare 6.4.2 the last of that branch and press forward
> with 6.5 beta test?

Nothing new gets added to the REL6_4 branch, period. Personally, there
also will never be a v6.4.3, so the REL6_4 branch effectively died the day
v6.4.2 was released...

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org