| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jan Wieck <jwieck(at)debis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, hannu(at)trust(dot)ee, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 6.5 beta and ORDER BY patch |
| Date: | 1999-02-03 15:38:19 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9902031137530.25913-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Jan Wieck wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > > Hi PostgreSQL hackers
> > > >
> > > > As we are again approaching the beta (feature freeze),
> > > > I will ask my ordinary question ;)
> > > >
> > > > Is the patch by Jan that eliminated the duplicate sort node in case it
> > > > was redundant included in 6.5 ?
> > >
> > > Sorry,
> > >
> > > I missed to put it into after v6.4 release. And since it
> > > wasn't there during v6.5 development, I would not put it in
> > > now.
> > >
> > > Note that it wasn't in the v6.4 feature patches either, so it
> > > isn't tested enough to get released.
> >
> > We haven't started beta yet. Anything on LIMIT?
>
> LIMIT is in there and was during entire v6.5 development.
> But ORDER BY suppressing sort using index wasn't.
Sinc we haven't started BETA yet, why not throw it in? Once beta, we stil
lhave another month of testing before release, so lots of time...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniele Orlandi | 1999-02-03 16:36:43 | Minor change for UPDATE |
| Previous Message | Nicolas Prochazka | 1999-02-03 13:27:06 | Blob BUG Since 6.4.2 |