RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7

From: Tom <tom(at)sdf(dot)com>
To: Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan(at)silcom(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7
Date: 1999-01-09 19:13:50
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9901091108220.19697-100000@misery.sdf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Sat, 9 Jan 1999, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:

...
> question, which is a basic benchmark comparing the two. Again, I'm not
> looking for 10 significant digits of precision or anything, I just want to
> know whether or not the two products are in the same ballpark in terms of
> raw performance. Assuming they are, then I can feel comfortable recommending
...

I don't if it possible to get such information, as I would think it be
illegal to tell anybody (publish) the results if Postgresql and MSQL were
benchmarked together. This is the whole point of the Oracle challege.
The only MSSQL benchmarks available are those produced by Microsoft,
because no body else is allowed to publish results. The only thing that
can be done, is to try to build an identical test system that Microsoft
used, and run the postgresql tests on it.

Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-01-09 20:07:40 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7
Previous Message Todd Graham Lewis 1999-01-09 19:11:04 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1999-01-09 20:07:40 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7
Previous Message Todd Graham Lewis 1999-01-09 19:11:04 Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7