Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7.0?

From: Tom <tom(at)sdf(dot)com>
To: "Jackson, DeJuan" <djackson(at)cpsgroup(dot)com>
Cc: Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan(at)silcom(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, "'jayson(at)biztown(dot)com'" <jayson(at)biztown(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7.0?
Date: 1999-01-09 07:56:32
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9901082351480.20114-100000@misery.sdf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers


On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Jackson, DeJuan wrote:

> I can't really give a feature comparison of MS SQL 7.0 as I've never
> used it. as for a benchmarking, although it is out of date, check
> http://www.tcx.se/benchmark.html. There is no direct comparison of
> PostgreSQL and MS SQL but it might give you some idea of something (hey
> I can't make heads or tails of it all, but remember a smaller bar is
> better).
> Oh well, hope this helps somebody somehow,
> -DEJ

There appear to be significant benchmarking hurdles with MS SQL 7.0
Hasn't everybody seen Oracle's million dollar challenge to Microsoft? It
is somewhere on www.oracle.com Basically, if you can publish benchmark
results that show Oracle less than X times (was it 90 times?) faster than
MS SQL, Oracle would give you a million bucks. The trick here is that the
licence agreements for many DBMS prohibit the publishing of benchmarks!
Either that, or Oracle really is 90 times faster than MS SQL!

Tom

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-01-09 12:59:51 RE: [GENERAL] Benchmarking PGSQL against Microsoft SQL 7
Previous Message Shane Wilson 1999-01-09 03:59:50 MSaccess97 instert & memo

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-01-09 09:29:13 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR
Previous Message Vince Vielhaber 1999-01-09 03:37:02 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR