Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Paul A Vixie <paul(at)vix(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR
Date: 1999-01-08 17:54:12
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9901081352570.42675-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Ummm...why are we rehashing this? Who/why is anyone tryign to assign
blame? It happened...so? Let's avoid it happening again, but I think we
are up to, what, 4 martyrs now? :)

On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Paul A Vixie wrote:

> you're all wrong. 6.4 was late because of me. i didn't know the postgresql
> development process or political process, and that combined with some real
> life issues made me unresponsive and/or unavailable when d'arcy needed me.
> you all have my apologies, and i promise that i will do better next time.
>

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Constantin Teodorescu 1999-01-08 18:15:45 Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 lateness and CIDR
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1999-01-08 17:40:23 SUM() and GROUP BY