Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL handle this?

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: David <dsiebert(at)gate(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Can PostgreSQL handle this?
Date: 1998-12-04 14:57:24
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.9812041057011.13885-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 3 Dec 1998, David wrote:

> I am considering moving our corporate data base from goldmine to an SQL
> server. PostgreSQL is high on the list mainly because of the price, ODBC,
> perl, and Java support.
> But I would really need to have several k worth of Note, several k worth of
> history, and I would like to scan in their contract. I am guessing that I
> would be looking at between 10000 up to 100000 rows of data with less than
> 100 rows. Can PostgreSQL handle this?

Yes, compared to what some ppl are doing, that is just a small
database :)

Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-12-04 14:59:15 Re: [GENERAL] compiling postgresql 6.4 in BSDi
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-12-04 14:55:41 Re: [GENERAL] Text Databases