From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Taral <taral(at)cyberjunkie(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)usa(dot)net> |
Subject: | RE: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |
Date: | 1998-11-15 06:41:46 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.4.05.9811150241160.333-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
On Sun, 15 Nov 1998, Taral wrote:
> Hear ye! Hear ye!
>
> I've just started stressing my brain on the CORBA 2 docs... It turns out
> that CORBA will be completely compatible with the existing system.
>
> postmaster will register a "method server" with the ORB (which is a separate
> process in mico, at least). A "method server" is one which requires a
> separate process for every method invocation. Which is basically what we do
> now with our one-backend-per-connection system. At least until the backend
> is thread-safe, we're stuck with it. When the backend is thread-safe, we can
> switch to "unshared server" where we have one per database. :)
>
> Taral
>
> P.S. When will that corba-specific list be set up? I'm sure that well over
> half of the list didn't care one bit about what I just said.
See Bruce's post...discussion is moved to pgsql-interfaces...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 1998-11-15 06:43:29 | Re: [HACKERS] BIG grant problem |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 1998-11-15 06:31:42 | Re: [HACKERS] BIG grant problem |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Taral | 1998-11-15 07:24:52 | ORB API |
Previous Message | Taral | 1998-11-15 06:29:47 | RE: [HACKERS] More PostgreSQL+CORBA |