Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Last call?

I cannot believe, RH4.2 isn't a glibc2 system.

-Egon

On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, Terry Mackintosh wrote:

> Hi Tom
>
> Nope, RH4.2/libc5, same as you.
> Still waiting for the dust to settle on the glibc thing:)
>
> On Sun, 25 Oct 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
>
> > > > 'Linux ix86' had an '_', or unknown
> > > Thanks Terry, but I've already got that one done
> >
> > But Oliver was asking about glibc2 vs libc5. Do you happen to have a
> > glibc machine (RH 5.x?) available? If so we could use a direct report of
> > success since I'm still running RH4.2/libc5 for development...
> >
> > - Tom
>
>
> Terry Mackintosh <terry(at)terrym(dot)com> http://www.terrym.com
> sysadmin/owner Please! No MIME encoded or HTML mail, unless needed.
>
> Proudly powered by R H Linux 4.2, Apache 1.3, PHP 3, PostgreSQL 6.3
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Success Is A Choice ... book by Rick Patino, get it, read it!
>
>
>