Re: [HACKERS] psql problem

From: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, chris(at)bitmead(dot)com, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql problem
Date: 2000-02-17 10:56:54
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.4.05.10002170555230.22914-100000@paprika.michvhf.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Tom Lane wrote:

> >> What? Are you saying that control-C doesn't do a \r (reset the
> >> query buffer)? That's probably true, and I agree that it should...
>
> > Looks like it works fine:
>
> > test=> select * from pg_class, pg_proc;
> > ^C
> > Cancel request sent
> > ERROR: Query was cancelled.
> > test=>
>
> No, I think Chris was complaining about the behavior with an
> incomplete query in the buffer. I can't show it with current
> sources since psql is exiting on ^C, but 6.5 works like this:

Actually from reading Chris' note, he said that it was 'better than
previous behaviour'. Note the key word was *previous*.

Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev(at)michvhf(dot)com http://www.pop4.net
128K ISDN: $24.95/mo or less - 56K Dialup: $17.95/mo or less at Pop4
Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com
Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com
==========================================================================

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2000-02-17 11:17:09 Re: [HACKERS] psql problem
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2000-02-17 09:30:20 Re: [HACKERS] FYI: BNF for SQL93 and SQL-3