From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | M(dot)Boekhold(at)et(dot)tudelft(dot)nl |
Cc: | Bruce Tong <zztong(at)laxmi(dot)ev(dot)net>, James Olin Oden <joden(at)lee(dot)k12(dot)nc(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] |
Date: | 1998-07-24 01:56:19 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980723225509.261G-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Maarten Boekhold wrote:
> > Exactly. I'm learning SQL and PostgreSQL at the same time and it is
> > sometimes difficult for me to correctly assess what belongs with each. My
> > recent GRANT/REVOKE question was like this. I didn't think for a minute
> > that would be handled by SQL since databases were created and destroyed by
> > PostgreSQL utilities.
>
> In fact, they are handled by SQL: CREATE DATABASE and DROP DATABASE. The
> createdb and destroydb tools just call these SQL statements....
Here's an odd thought:
Let's remove the "I don't want to think" utilities like
{create,destroy}{db,user} and force DBA's to actually use the *proper*
functions.
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-07-24 01:57:40 | Re: [GENERAL] How about this LOGO? |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-07-24 01:53:17 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Lynch | 1998-07-24 02:29:23 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-07-24 01:53:17 | Re: [GENERAL] Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: SGVLLUG Oracle and Informix on Linux] |