From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Suresh Raman <suresh(at)boxerjam(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [QUESTIONS] libpg - segmentation fault |
Date: | 1998-04-10 19:24:50 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980410162246.290F-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Moved to pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
On Fri, 10 Apr 1998, Suresh Raman wrote:
>
> Guess I just read in between the lines. I was half-expecting someone
> to tell me not to act too smart..and when I read the post, I thought
> that's what Tom was telling me.
Nope...its very very rare that we tell someone this :) We might
be critical of any patches that come through, but if you are willing to
take constructive critism's...? :)
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Good | 1998-04-12 23:57:14 | ecpg *very* problematic... |
Previous Message | Peter T Mount | 1998-04-10 18:48:29 | Re: [HACKERS] New pg_type for large object |