palloc failures...still...

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: adrian(at)trends(dot)ca
Subject: palloc failures...still...
Date: 1998-04-10 16:20:35
Message-ID: Pine.BSF.3.96.980410131429.290B-100000@thelab.hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Morning everyone...

After upgrading the server to -current, which is meant for
release on April 15th, I'm still receiving a palloc() failure, as shown
below.

The server is a 486DX with 64Meg of RAM, and the able that is
being searched is *only* 5k records large...and the query below will
return *only* 1 of those records...

Apr 10 01:59:47 clio radiusd[22585]: query failed: select uniq_id from \
radlog where uniq_id='237286618' and stop_time=0 and \
term_server='isdn-1.trends.ca';
Apr 10 01:59:47 clio radiusd[22585]: query failed: FATAL 1: palloc \
failure: memory exhausted

And, I'm still getting alot of:

FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected
FATAL 1: btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-04-10 17:31:26 Re: [HACKERS] palloc failures...still...
Previous Message Kent S. Gordon 1998-04-10 15:32:38 Re: [HACKERS] New pg_type for large object