From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Hal Snyder <hal(at)vailsys(dot)com> |
Cc: | maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c? |
Date: | 1998-03-12 05:48:28 |
Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980312014650.257S-100000@thelab.hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Hal Snyder wrote:
> > From: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
> > Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 23:11:37 -0500 (EST)
>
> > OK, please tell me what macro is a monster, and what define I can check
> > to see if I am using the SCO/Microsoft/piece-O-junk :-) compiler, and I
> > will take a crack at making a static function out of the macro and send
> > you a patch to test.
>
> src/include/access/heapam.h - heap_getattr is the one that blows the
> mind of SCO ODT5 /bin/cc as well as their Skunkware gcc-2.7.2.1. Pure
> GNU 2.8.1 was all I could get to handle it.
I don't believe that this is a "religious war" issue...but why do
ppl even *use* the stock C compilers anymore? I know at work we us all
GCC/G++ stuff, since its one helluva lot cheaper then picking up Sun's CC
compiler...I'm not advocating requiring GCC...just wondering one ppl
actually do use the stock compiler..
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Gould | 1998-03-12 06:00:45 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables? |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-03-12 05:15:51 | Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c? |