| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/bin/initdb initdb.sh' |
| Date: | 1998-02-24 04:38:43 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.BSF.3.96.980224003627.230N-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Can I suggest pgview_ then? Another problem is that a \d on an empty
> > > database, \d is going to show this view, isn't it. Kind of strange to
> > > me.
> >
> > I modified psql already such that:
> >
> > relname !~ '^[pd][bg]_'
> >
> > is ignored :)
>
> I still disagree. Why not keep the system stuff pg_? This can be done,
> and it keeps things consistent. The above check also finds pb_ and dg_.
Actually, I'm not married to db_* for views...it was a "quick fix"
to ensure that things still worked. Whatever we decide on, both Julie and
Peter, at a minimum, need to know relatively soon. I know in Julie's
case, she does do a call to pg_user...I let her know tonight that she
needs to change it to db_user, for the *current* code...
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brett McCormick | 1998-02-24 04:59:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Views on aggregates - need assistence |
| Previous Message | Vadim B. Mikheev | 1998-02-24 04:26:09 | Re: [HACKERS] regression: select_views.sql |